Clearly the numbers spoke for themselves, but in June, author Elizabeth Cline suggested that Mrs. Obama was not the godsend to the fashion industry, which she had been declared by so many.
“I think it’s ridiculous that she’s always lauded as this example of democratic fashion or that she’s so American because her fashion is accessible,” Cline told Huffington Post. “The reality is that the garment and textile trade has been a dying industry for the last 10 years. So why are we so excited when we see our first lady in cheap, imported clothes?”
For the larger public, the reality is that most clothing today is mass-produced and made on foreign soil. This happens because manufacturers want cheap labor and to escape North American labor laws. Short of shopping at second-hand stores, it is nearly impossible to find clothing that is made in North America, though the company itself may be a North American company. The best one can hope to do is to avoid purchasing items from a company known to utilize sweatshops. Even with that said, it is worth noting that though sweatshops are deemed something that happens in so-called third world countries, many of the larger cities throughout North America are home to hundreds of them.
The problem is about so much more than what Mrs. Obama chooses to wear. Though she may be one of the most powerful women in the world, like everyone else, she must make her purchases within an uneven global economic market. Everyday items are made through slave labor or manufactured in a system that essentially impoverishes the producers. Everything from coffee to sugar, bananas, chocolate, potatoes, and flowers can reasonably be argued to be products that should be avoided because of how they are produced or the tariffs placed on imports. When you have small countries who cannot afford to subsidize in the same manner as the U.S., there is no hope of having fair trade, let alone working practices which do not produce neo-slavery for the purposes of consumption.
At the Head of State and Government Reception at Buckingham Palace for the Olympics Opening Ceremony, Mrs. Obama wore a J. Mendel Resort 2013 jacket with a white pleated skirt. She looked absolutely stunning, but an issue quickly arose when it was reported that the J. Mendel Resort jacket cost a whopping, 6,800 dollars. To be clear, Mrs. Obama was representing the American people on an international stage and was in the presence of the Queen of England, yet the concern was what she wore? Would it have been preferable for her to show up wearing a cheap dress from Target?